Category talk:101 Standard Forms: Difference between revisions

From Engineering_Policy_Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
No edit summary
Smithk (talk | contribs)
Modot, modot
20,986 edits
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


[[User:smithk|Keith L. Smith]]:  Thanks for the heads up.  We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.
[[User:smithk|Keith L. Smith]]:  Thanks for the heads up.  We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.
The link to the time extension change order reasons is broken.

Revision as of 14:27, 16 March 2011

Please Correct the "construction Contingency" Cell within the Project Scoping Memorandum. Construction Contingency is suppose to be 2% but the cell is multiplying it by 3%.

Dan Tschirgi:The Project Scoping Memorandum has been corrected.

At least one of the posters on this page (MCHR-9) is outdated. Would it be better to just have a link to the posters on MoDOT's "Contractor Forms" page? [1] --Martik2 12:16, 9 March 2010 (CST)

Keith L. Smith: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.

Retrieved from "https://epgtest3.modot.org/index.php?title=Category_talk:101_Standard_Forms&oldid=25313"