Category:756 Seismic Design: Difference between revisions

From Engineering_Policy_Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Smithk (talk | contribs)
m Per Bridge, updated link to the Bridge Seismic Design Process Flowchart
Smithk (talk | contribs)
m Per Bridge, updated Seismic Design Process Flowchart link
Line 1: Line 1:
{|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:15px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="160px" align="right"  
{|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:15px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="160px" align="right"  
|-   
|-   
|[http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/BR/development/Shared%20Documents/Revised%20seismic%20flowchart/14-026-DSC%20SeismicRetrofitFlow_LFD%20R1.vsd Bridge Seismic Design Process Flowchart]
|[http://sharepoint/systemdelivery/BR/development/CompRev/EPG/OtherEPGSections/756_2014_14-026/14-026-DSC%20SeismicRetrofitFlow_LFD%20R1.vsd Bridge Seismic Design Process Flowchart]
|}
|}
All new bridges on the state system shall include some level of seismic design and/or detailing to resist earthquakes based upon an expected seismic event for a given return period. For example, in Seismic Performance Categories B, C and D, both design and detailing work is needed because of the increased probability of damaging earthquakes.
All new bridges on the state system shall include some level of seismic design and/or detailing to resist earthquakes based upon an expected seismic event for a given return period. For example, in Seismic Performance Categories B, C and D, both design and detailing work is needed because of the increased probability of damaging earthquakes.

Revision as of 06:09, 14 May 2014

Bridge Seismic Design Process Flowchart

All new bridges on the state system shall include some level of seismic design and/or detailing to resist earthquakes based upon an expected seismic event for a given return period. For example, in Seismic Performance Categories B, C and D, both design and detailing work is needed because of the increased probability of damaging earthquakes.

Seismic Performance Categories
Seismic Performance Categories
St. Louis Area


 

When existing bridges in SPC B, C and D are identified as needing repairs or maintenance, a decision on whether to include seismic retrofitting in the scope of the project should be made based on the location of the bridge, the extent of the rehabilitation work and the expected life of the bridge after the work. For example, if the bridge needs painting or deck patching, no retrofitting is recommended. However, redecking or widening the bridge indicates that MoDOT is planning to keep the bridge in the state system with an expected life of at least 30 more years. In these instances, the project core team should consider cost effective methods of retrofitting the existing bridge.

Bridge Dampers, Seismic
Report 2005
Summary 2005
Bridge, Cable-Stayed, Seismic
Report 2007
Earthquake Hazard Assessment
Report 2001
Summary 2001
See also: Innovation Library