606.2 Guard Cable: Difference between revisions

From Engineering_Policy_Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Smithk (talk | contribs)
Modot, modot
20,986 edits
Revison reflects latest policy resulting from recent comprehensive study of MoDOT's guard cable program.
m →‎606.2.4 Maintenance and Repair: minor change to splices per email from DB(CM)
 
(49 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{|border="4"
<div style="float: right; margin-top: 5px; margin-left: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">__TOC__</div>
|-style="background:yellow"
 
|'''[[Key Points 606.2 Guard Cable|Key Points]]'''
<div style="float: right; margin-top: 5px; margin-left: 5px; width:300px; background-color: #f8f9fa; padding: 0.3em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; text-align:left;">
|}
'''<u><center>Videos</center></u>'''
* [{{SERVER}}/documents/606.2_Cable_Rail_Test.mpg Successful guard cable test]
* [[media:606.1 Guard cable.wmv|Guard Cable in Action]]
* [http://www.youtube.com/modotvideo#p/u/1/IZTtBN7CHxY MoDOT's You Tube Guard Cable video]
</div>


==606.2.1 Guard Cable Types==


{|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:1px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="185px" align="right"
Guard cable consists of twisted wire ropes mounted on weak posts. There are two types of guard cable systems in use on Missouri roadways: low-tension and high-tension. All new installations will be high-tension.
|-
|'''For Additional Information'''
|-
|[[For Additional Information 606.2 Guard Cable|Maintenance]]
|-
|[http://www.savemolives.com/programs/documents/I70GuardCableStateFair--updated.ppt Installing Guard Cable and Safety Information about Guard Cable]
|-
|'''Video'''
|-
|[{{SERVER}}/documents/606.2_Cable_Rail_Test.mpg Successful guard cable test]
|}


Guard cable consists of twisted wire ropes mounted on weak posts. It is relatively inexpensive to install, compared to more rigid systems, and has been proven effective at capturing errant vehicles.
'''606.2.1.1 Low-Tension.''' Existing low-tension guard cable may remain in place as long as the guard cable system is in serviceable condition. Low-tension guard cable shall not be used for new barrier installations. Existing low-tension guard cable systems may be repaired when damaged (see [[606.2_Guard_Cable#606.2.4_Maintenance_and_Repair|EPG 606.2.4 Maintenance and Repair]]) if practical. When low-tension guard cable is reaching the end of its serviceable condition, the District may consider letting a contract to replace the low-tension guard cable with high-tension guard cable (or other approved barrier).


==606.2.1 Guard Cable Types==
[[image:606.2 Guard Cable.JPG|right|400px|thumb|<center>'''Low-tension Guard Cable'''</center>]]


Cable median barriers, commonly referred to as guard cable, remain one of the most efficient roadside safety treatment available today. There are two types of guard cable systems in use on Missouri roads: low-tension and high-tension.
'''606.2.1.2 High-Tension.''' High-tension guard cable consists of three or four pre-stressed cables supported by weak posts. All high-tension guard cable shall meet NCHRP 350 or MASH 2016 TL-3 requirements and be on MoDOT’s approved products list [https://www.modot.org/end-terminals-crash-cushions-and-barrier-systems End Terminals, Crash Cushions and Barrier Systems]. All high-tension guard cable shall be installed per manufacturer’s requirements.


'''606.2.1.1 Low-Tension.'''  Since no single producer exclusively manufactures low-tension guard cable, this system has been commonly called the “U.S. generic” system.  Low-tension guard cables typically consists of three cables placed at different heights and are tensioned only enough to eliminate sag between posts. Large springs at either end of the cable run are compressed, according to temperature, to achieve the system’s low tension.  The cable itself is strung on posts that are directly driven into the ground.
A common installation of high-tension guard cable employs concrete footings into which metal tubes are cast, forming sockets. The socket allows a post to be replaced with relative ease during a repair operation. The damaged post can be removed from the socket and replaced with a new post. Socketed systems eliminate the requirement for specialized post driving equipment and subsurface utility location for each repair.
[[image:606.2 Guard Cable.JPG|right|400px|thumb|<center>'''Low-tension Guard Cable'''</center>]]
When a vehicle impacts the low-tension system under normal conditions, the cable laterally moves as much as 12 ft. This movement is known as the dynamic deflection.


Given the lack of tension in the system, individual installations, or “runs”, of cable are limited to 2000 ft. with an anchor assembly at each end. When a vehicle strikes low-tension cable, the system becomes disabled and will not function properly if subsequently struck by another vehicle. As such, it is critical to repair the guard cable promptly.
<div style="float: left; margin-top: 8px; margin-right: 15px; margin-bottom: 8px; padding: 18px; border: 1px solid black; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888">
'''<u><center>Median Guard Cable</center></u>'''
* [https://spexternal.modot.mo.gov/sites/cm/CORDT/ss07006.pdf Summary, 2006]
* [https://spexternal.modot.mo.gov/sites/cm/CORDT/or10016.pdf Report, 2010]
* '''See also:''' [https://www.modot.org/research-publications Research Publications]
</div>


Low-tension systems have been in service for some time and have proven their value by reducing cross-median accidents. However, the issues related to down time and the necessity to utilize on-call contracting cause a perpetual drain on MoDOT resources.  For these reasons, the use of low-tension cable systems should be limited to small-scale installations with special circumstances.
==606.2.2 Warrants==


'''606.2.1.2 High-Tension.'''  High-tension cable barrier looks very similar to low-tension cable but the two systems are very different in most other aspects.  High-tension guard cable consists of three or four pre-stressed cables supported by weak posts. 
Analyses of cross-median incident history and traffic volume provide valuable information in determining the likelihood of future incidents on these routes. In order to prevent future incidents, it is important to focus safety efforts on locations that will benefit the most from safety countermeasures.  
[[image:606.2.1.2 High-Tension.jpg|right|575px|thumb|<center>'''High-tension Guard Cable'''</center>]]
During installation, the cables are placed on the posts and then tightened to a specific tension, ranging from approximately 2,000 to 9,000 pounds according to temperature.  Due to this tightening, the cable installations can be of indefinite length. In fact, the runs are typically only limited by the presence of obstacles such as median openings or bridge columns.


Under normal conditions, when a vehicle impacts the high-tension system the cable laterally deflects as much as 8 ft.  The inherent tension within the system also allows the cable to remain at the proper height, even after an impact removes several posts. While the system is not designed to continue to function in that condition, there is a great deal of anecdotal evidence that it does just that.
The risk of cross-median crashes can be influenced by  median width and the traffic volume on both roadways (two-way AADT).  Figure 606.2.2 shows various levels for implementation based on the anticipated benefits of reducing crashes compared to costs for installation, maintenance, and overall crash impact. The [http://sp/sites/ts/Pages/default.aspx Highway Safety and Traffic Division] may be contacted for additional details on how the anticipated benefits of guard cable installation were determined.
{| border="1" class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" align="right"
<center>
|+'''Currently Approved High-Tension Systems and Manufacturers'''
{| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"
! style="background:#BEBEBE"|High-Tension System !! style="background:#BEBEBE"|Manufacturer 
|-
|-
|Brifen|| Brifen USA 
|width="475" align="center"|[[image:606.2.2.jpg|470px]]
|-
|-
|CASS||Trinity Industries, Inc.
|width="415" align="center"|'''Figure 606.2.2, Median Guard Cable Levels as Related to Median Width and Two-Way AADT'''
|-
|Gibraltar||Gibraltar 
|-
|Safence||Safence, Inc. 
|-
|U.S. High Tension|| Marion Steel Company 
|}
|}
</center>
Median guard cable should be installed in Level 1 locations.


A common installation of high-tension guard cable employs concrete footings into which metal tubes are cast, forming sockets. The socket allows a post to be replaced with relative ease during a repair operation. The damaged post is simply removed from the socket and replaced with a virgin post.  Socketed systems eliminate the requirement for specialized post driving equipment and subsurface utility location for each repair.
Median guard cable may be installed in Level 2 or 3 locations based on engineering judgment. Guard cable may be installed on Level 4, but is not typical and should have additional justification based on the context of the location.  


A socketed, high-tension system should be chosen for large-scale guard cable installations. While such a system generally has a higher initial cost, the low cost and high efficiency with which it can be maintained make it a better value over its life cycle. A high-tension system incorporating socketed posts is easily repaired and maintained with the resources currently available to the district maintenance personnel.  Additionally, high-tension systems can be used on a variety of median inslopes, often eliminating the need for costly slope corrections and drainage modifications.
'''606.2.2.1 Data.''' Analysis of incidents on a candidate corridor should focus on cross-median incidents on that route.  


As of 2007, all high-tension systems are proprietary, that is, marketed under exclusive rights of a specific manufacturer. Five systems are currently marketed in the United States.
It is important this data analysis is accurate and complete for all roadways. Due to at-grade intersection incidents on these routes, a simple query of cross-median incidents may include unwanted events and exclude necessary ones. Accuracy of this data is vital in decision-making.  


==606.2.2 Systematic Application of Median Guard Cable==
The data should be reviewed regularly to validate priorities and identify any emerging cross-median safety concerns. A regular review of divided highway traffic volume and incidents will provide information to address cross-median incidents.  


Median guard cable is most effective when installed as a system-wide solution to address cross-median crash types. The benefits are severely limited if the cable is only used in spot locations in response to crashes at those locations.
'''606.2.2.2 Traffic Volume.'''  Recent research has connected traffic volume growth directly to cross-median incidents. As volume increases, the probability of a motorist crossing the median and hitting an oncoming vehicle also increases. Instead of relying solely on incident history, there is an opportunity to proactively address this incident type before the incidents occur by studying traffic volume patterns and installing a system of median guard cable on routes with sharply increasing volumes. See Figure 606.2.2 for the anticipated impact traffic volume has on crash risk and anticipated value for guard cable installation.  


Additionally, when determining the most appropriate locations for guard cable application, the designation of a route (interstate, US highway, state route) should not be a primary consideration.
'''606.2.2.3 [[231.1 Median Width|Median Width]].''' Recent national experience has shown that cross-median incidents can occur on highways with median widths above MoDOT's initial 60 ft. threshold. Although this width has largely proven to be effective in deterring such incidents, no route will be excluded from analysis solely on the basis of median width. Divided highways with very wide medians are expected to have a low risk of cross-median incidents. See Figure 606.2.2 for the anticipated impact median width has on crash risk and anticipated value for guard cable installation.


A corridor should have similar geometry and traffic volume and the placement of guard cable on the corridor should have logical termini. Spot location installation of new median guard cable should be used sparingly only in unique situations.
==606.2.3 Design and Installation Guidelines==
===606.2.3.1 Lateral Placement in the Median===


==606.2.3 Warrants==
'''Dynamics of Cross-Median Incidents.''' When a vehicle leaves the roadway and enters the median, certain predictable dynamics occur.  Vehicles may enter the median at a variety of speeds and angles but for the purposes of roadside safety research and testing, a 62 mph departure at a 25° angle is generally used.


Analyses of cross-median crash history and traffic volume provide valuable information in determining the likelihood of future severe crashes on these routes.  In order to prevent future fatalities and disabling injuries, it is important to focus safety efforts on locations that will benefit the most from safety countermeasures.
Upon departure, a vehicle will initially continue along its vertical trajectory.  As the inslope falls away along the 25° vehicle path, the vehicle effectively becomes briefly airborne.  When the vehicle's inertia can no longer overcome gravity, it lands and its suspension is deeply compressed.  As the vehicle continues to travel through the median, the suspension rebounds and the bumper of the vehicle stays at a relatively constant height throughout the remainder of the errant journey.
 
'''606.2.3.1 Crash Data.''' Analysis of crashes on a candidate corridor should focus on cross-median crashes on that route and, even more so, on those crashes resulting in fatalities and disabling injuries.
 
It is important this data analysis is robust, particularly on expressways.  Due to at-grade intersection crashes on these routes, a simple query of cross-median crashes may include unwanted events and exclude necessary ones.  Accuracy of these data is vital in decision-making.
 
The data should be reviewed each year to validate priorities and identify any emerging cross-median safety concerns.  A regular review of divided highway traffic volume and crashes will provide information to proactively address severe cross-median crashes.
 
'''606.2.3.2 Traffic Volume.'''  Recent research has connected traffic volume growth directly to cross-median crash events.  As volume increases, the probability of a motorist crossing the median and hitting an oncoming vehicle also increases.  Instead of relying solely on crash history, there is an opportunity to proactively address this crash type before the crashes occur by studying traffic volume patterns and installing a system of median guard cable on routes with sharply increasing volumes.
 
'''606.2.3.3 [[231.1 Median Width|Median Width]].''' Recent national experience has shown that cross-median crashes occur on highways with median widths above MoDOT's initial 60 ft. threshold.  No route will be excluded from analysis solely on the basis of median width.  Divided highways with very wide medians are expected to have little or no cross-median crash history that effectly removes them from consideration for barrier installation.
 
==606.2.4 Design and Installation Guidelines==
===606.2.4.1 Lateral Placement in the Median===


'''Dynamics of Cross-Median Crashes.''' When a vehicle leaves the roadway and enters the median, certain predictable dynamics occur.  Vehicles may enter the median at a variety of speeds and angles but for the purposes of roadside safety research and testing, a 60 mph departure at a 20° or 25° angle is generally used.
Every guard cable incident is slightly different because of a host of site-specific factors. In general, however, the front of the vehicle must engage at least two of the three or four cables present in order to be contained by the system.  Given the dynamics described above, lateral placement of the cable can be grouped into two main categories:  medians wider than 30 ft. and those narrower than 30 ft.
[[image:606.2.3.1_01-04-2024.jpg|right]]


Upon departure, a vehicle will initially continue along its vertical trajectory.  As the inslope falls away along the 25° vehicle path, the vehicle effectively becomes briefly airborne. When the vehicle's inertia can no longer overcome gravity, it lands and its suspension is deeply compressed. As the vehicle continues to travel through the median, the suspension rebounds and the bumper of the vehicle stays at a relatively constant height throughout the remainder of the errant journey.
'''Medians 30 ft. or wider.''' The guard cable should be installed no more than 4 ft. downslope of the edge of the shoulder. With wider shoulders, the downslope location could be less than 4 ft., but in any case, there shall be a minimum of 8 ft. between the barrier and the edge of traveled way. There are several advantages to this location but chief among them is the performance of the system in a incident. At the 4 ft. downslope location, the errant vehicle adjacent to the barrier, while airborne, is not at a great enough altitude to override the cable during a front side encounter. From the opposing direction, or backside, the suspension of the errant vehicle will have recovered enough to allow an impact to occur under relatively normal impact conditions.  


Every guard cable crash is slightly different because of a host of site-specific factors.  In general, however, the front of the vehicle must engage at least two of the three or four cables present in order to be contained by the system.  Given the dynamics described above, lateral placement of the cable can be grouped into two main categories:  medians wider than 30 ft. and those narrower than 30 ft.
If the 8 ft. separation cannot be obtained, the designer must work with the Central Office Design Division to assess the potential safety impacts of a decreased deflection distance. A different barrier system should be considered.  
[[image:606.2.4.1 Placement.png|600px|right]]
'''Medians 30 ft. or wider.'''  The guard cable should be installed 4 ft. downslope of the edge of the shoulder.  Assuming a 4 ft. inside shoulder, this location would place the barrier 8 ft. from the edge of the traveled way.  There are several advantages to this location but chief among them is the performance of the system in a crash. At the 4 ft. downslope location, the errant vehicle adjacent to the barrier, while airborne, is not at a great enough altitude to override the cable during a front side encounter.  From the opposing direction, or backside, the suspension of the errant vehicle will have recovered enough to allow an impact to occur under relatively normal impact conditions.


'''Medians narrower than 30 ft.'''  In medians narrower than 30 ft., the guard cable should be installed within 1 ft. of the vertex of either a V or flat-bottomed ditch. As previously discussed, this location performs the most advantageously. The 4 ft. downslope location starts to fail in narrower medians as the suspension of the vehicle impacting from the back side (i.e. the opposite direction) is the most tightly compressed around that location. Again, a fully compressed suspension has proven to be the principal reason for vehicles underriding the system.
'''Medians narrower than 30 ft.'''  In medians narrower than 30 ft., the guard cable should be installed within 1 ft. of the vertex of either a V or flat-bottomed ditch. As previously discussed, this location performs the most advantageously. When placed 4 ft. downslope in narrow medians, the suspension of the vehicle impacting from the back side (i.e. the opposite direction) is most tightly compressed near that location. A compressed suspension has potential to underride the system.  


'''Alternating Sides.'''  The designer may choose to alternate the sides of the median where the barrier is placed for the purpose of reducing any shy line issues or discomfort for motorists.  The change should occur at natural breaks in the barrier such as emergency crossovers or median bridge columns.
'''Alternating Sides.'''  The designer may choose to alternate the sides of the median where the barrier is placed for the purpose of reducing any shy line issues or discomfort for motorists.  The change should occur at natural breaks in the barrier such as emergency crossovers or median bridge columns.


'''Lateral Placement of Low-tension Guard Cable.'''  New installations of low-tension guard cable should be installed within 1 ft. of the vertex of either a V or flat-bottomed ditch.  Retrofits should be located at the existing offset, provided the system is functioning well.
===606.2.3.2 Parallel Installations===
 
===606.2.4.2 Parallel Installations===
In-service experience with parallel installations has shown less than desirable results.  The close proximity of each installation to traffic has caused an inordinately high incidence of nuisance hits resulting in higher than acceptable long-term maintenance costs.  Vegetative maintenance is also a concern.
In-service experience with parallel installations has shown less than desirable results.  The close proximity of each installation to traffic has caused an inordinately high incidence of nuisance hits resulting in higher than acceptable long-term maintenance costs.  Vegetative maintenance is also a concern.


Parallel installations of guard cable should not be used.  Instead, designers should rely upon guard cable designed for the situation as a single run or consider a barrier system other than guard cable.
Parallel installations of guard cable should not be used.  Instead, designers should rely upon guard cable designed for the situation as a single run or consider a barrier system other than guard cable.


===606.2.4.3 Post Spacing===
===606.2.3.3 Post Spacing===
While guard cable has been tested and approved with post spacing ranging from 6.5 to 32.5 ft., it is widely believed that the wider post spacing leads to greater deflections and an increased likelihood of vehicle penetration due to underride or traveling between the cables.  For this reason, post spacing should not exceed the conventional limit of 20 ft.  Additionally, increasing post spacing through horizontal curves increases the opportunity for the cable to assume a chord length if the posts are damaged.  If enough posts are damages, the cable could project into the travelway on the inside of the curve.
<div style="float: right">
<gallery widths=250px heights=250px position="right" style="text-align:center; font-weight:bold; margin-left:0em" >
File:606.2.4.6.jpg|Anchor Assembly
File:vegetation_barrier.png|Vegetation Barrier
</gallery>
</div>
While guard cable has been tested and approved with post spacing ranging from 6.5 to 32.5 ft., it is widely believed that the wider post spacing leads to greater deflections and an increased likelihood of vehicle penetration due to underride or traveling between the cables.  For this reason, post spacing should not exceed the conventional limit of 20 ft or the manufacturer's recommendation.  Additionally, increasing post spacing through horizontal curves increases the opportunity for the cable to assume a chord length if the posts are damaged.  If enough posts are damaged, the cable could project into the travelway on the inside of the curve.
 
===606.2.3.4 Slopes===
[[131.2 Proprietary Items and Public Interest Findings#131.2.1.1 Proprietary Items|Proprietary]] high-tension systems are approved for use on slopes with gradients between 1V:6H (6:1) to 1V:4H (4:1). 


===606.2.4.4 Slopes===
===606.2.3.5 Vegetative Barrier===
'''1V:6H (6:1) or Flatter Slopes.'''  Guard cable, like most roadside hardware, is intended for use on slopes that are 1V:6H (6:1) or flatter. This requirement is based on both computer modeling and full-scale crash testing and represents sound theory. In practice, however, slopes as flat at 1V:6H are often the exception.
[[:Category:822 Roadside Vegetation Management|Vegetation control]] in the area between the cable and the passing lane should be addressed. Failure to provide some positive form of vegetation control will hinder the future maintenance of the system. The core team shall consult with the local maintenance personnel to arrive at a vegetative control measure that is mutually agreeable. Vegetation control may not be omitted from a project as a practical design or value engineering measure. Control of vegetation around guard cable systems can be largely addressed with the addition of a vegetative barrier. The use of a vegetative barrier reduces future hand mowing or herbicide operations. See [[Job_Special_Provisions|JSP2404 Vegetative Barrier Pavement]] for design and construction requirements. See [[#602.4 Maintenance and Repair|EPG 606.2.4 Maintenance and Repair]] for vegetation maintenance.


'''Steeper Slopes.'''  Three [[131.5 Proprietary Items and Public Interest Findings#131.5.1.1 Proprietary Items|proprietary]] high-tension systems are now approved for use one slopes with gradients between 1V:6H (6:1) and 1V:4H (4:1).  Their use, while generally more expensive, represents the most cost-effective solution for shielding steeper slopes.  Further, since three equivalent sources exist, there is not need to obtain a [[131.5 Proprietary Items and Public Interest Findings#131.5.1.2 Public Interest Findings|public interest finding]] for their use.
===606.2.3.6 Termination at Crossovers and [[:Category:240 Maintenance and Emergency Crossovers|Emergency Crossovers]]===


===606.2.4.5 Vegetative Barrier===
The design for guard cable termination as well as the grading for the crossover shall be in accordance with [https://www.modot.org/media/47258 Standard Plan 606.42].  Refer to [[:Category:240 Maintenance and Emergency Crossovers#240.4 Guard Cable Termination at Emergency Crossovers|EPG 240.4 Guard Cable Termination at Emergency Crossovers]] for additional information.
[[:Category:822 Roadside Vegetation Management|Vegetation control]] in the area between the cable and the passing lane must be addressed.  Failure to provide some positive form of vegetation control will hinder the future maintenance of the system.  Positive vegetation control measures may include [[:Category:821 Herbicides and Roadsides|herbicides]], a geotextile-aggregate strip or asphalt apron.  The core team must consult with the local maintenance personnel to arrive at a vegetative control measure that is mutually agreeable.


A district's decision to mow around the barrier must be approved by [http://wwwi/maintenance/ Central Office Maintenance]. Such mowing operations must be accomplished without impeding through traffic in any matter.
==606.2.4 Maintenance and Repair==


Vegetation control may not be omitted from a project as a practical design or value engineering measure.
Guard cable is only as functional as its ongoing maintenance and repair. Proper maintenance and incident repair will ensure that the system is always in a state of functionality to provide motorists a greater level of safety on Missouri roadways.  


===606.2.4.6 Termination at [[:Category:240 Maintenance and Emergency Crossovers|Emergency Crossovers]]===
'''Vegetation Maintenance.'''  District maintenance shall provide vegetative control around guard cable systems. Vegetation maintenance measures should include mowing, [[:Category:821 Herbicides and Roadsides|herbicides]], a geotextile-aggregate strip or an asphalt apron may have been constructed during initial installation.


The design for guard cable termination as well as the grading for the crossover should be in accordance with [http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/standards_and_specs/documents/60641.pdf Standard Plan 606.41, Sheet 6 of 6].
'''Cable Tension.''' If pre-stressed cables are used for high-tension systems and compensators are properly compressed for low-tension systems, the tension in the cable should properly acclimate to any weather condition.  Tension logs shall be stored in the contract specific eProjects folder.  The tension log form is available at [[:Category:101_Standard_Forms|EPG 101 Standard Forms]].


==606.2.5 Maintenance and Repair==
'''Cable Height. '''  The importance of cable height to properly capture and redirect errant vehicles has been demonstrated. Although cable height is relatively static in all systems, erosion and tire rutting under the barrier can sometimes cause a localized increase in height, resulting in possible underride. When ditch erosion or rutting causes the cable heights to be outside the manufacturer’s recommended maximum, corrective measures should  be performed by either the on-call contractor or by in-house Maintenance forces.


Irrespective of routes treated, proper placement or system used, cable median barrier is only as functional as its ongoing maintenance and repair.  Proper maintenance and incident repair will ensure that the system is always in a state of functionality to provide motorists a greater level of safety on Missouri highways.
Maintenance personnel should be aware of minimum and maximum cable heights and encouraged to identify locations where erosion or the accumulation of silt have altered the relative cable height.  


'''Routine Maintenance. '''  Outside of vegetation control, there is little routine maintenance required for a guard cable system.  If pre-stressed cables are used for high-tension systems and compensators are properly compressed for low-tension systems, the tension in the cable should properly acclimate to any weather condition.  The tension monitoring stage occurs during and shortly after construction.
'''Median Condition. '''  The median condition with respect to rutting, loss of vegetation and incident debris should be remedied by Maintenance forces following each incident.  


'''Cable Height. '''  The importance of cable height to properly capture and redirect errant vehicles has been demonstrated. Although cable height is relatively static in all systems, erosion under the barrier can sometimes cause a localized increase in height, resulting in possible underride.
'''Guard Cable Repair.''' Incident repairs shall be performed by the on-call contractor. See [[147.3 Job Order Contracting (JOC)#147.3.10 Guardrail and Guard Cable Repair|EPG 147.3.10 Guardrail and Guard Cable Repair]] for additional Job Order Contracting requirements for guard cable repairs.


Maintenance personnel should be educated on the necessity of proper cable height and encouraged to identify and repair locations where erosion or the accumulation of silt have altered the relative cable height.  
'''Splices.''' Cable repair splices for low-tension systems will be no closer than 400 feet per cable within a 2000-foot run (anchor to anchor). When a repair to a low-tension cable would require splices closer than 400 feet, repair with a sufficient length of cable necessary to ensure splices are separated by no less than 400’.


'''Median Condition. '''  A secondary issue, closely related to incident repair, is the post-entry condition of the median. In addition to the repair of the roadside hardware, the median condition with respect to rutting, loss of vegetation and accident debris should be remedied following each accident.  These incidental concerns could cause instability in the trajectory of future errant vehicles and could, at worst, result in a failure of the system.
Cable repair splices for high-tension systems will be no closer than 200 feet per cable within a 1000-foot run (turn buckle to turn buckle). When a repair to a high-tension cable would require splices closer than 200 feet, repair with a sufficient length of cable necessary to ensure splices are separated by no less than 200’.


'''Low-Tension Cable Barrier Repair:  On-Call Contract.'''  Maintenance of low-tension cable barrier is vastly more complicated than that of a high-tension system.  In fact, the complexity of the system coupled with the frequency of crash incidents, have traditionally resulted in the system’s maintenance being outsourced through on-call contracts.
==606.2.5 Maintenance Planning Guidelines for Guard Cable==


On-call repair has generally worked well with the notable exception being a lack of adequate response to repairs in some rural areas.  This is thought to be due to difficulty in mobilizing specialty contractors to complete the work.
See [[:Category:170 Maintenance Activity Planning Guidelines#R227 Roadway & Bridge Safety Features|Maintenance Planning Guideline for Guard Cable]].


'''High-Tension Cable Barrier Repair: In-House.'''  Equipment and hardware needs for the repair of high-tension, socketed guard cable are minimal and repairs can generally be accomplished in under an hour with two workers, some hand tools and a pickup truck.
Index of all [[:Category:170 Maintenance Activity Planning Guidelines#Index of Printable Planning Guides|Maintenance Planning Guidelines]].


'''Response Time.'''  Due to the importance of the median guard cable performing when needed, it is vital to quickly respond to repair needs.  This will often necessitate an effort to identify cable hits as soon as possible after the incident and then respond with repair as quickly as possible.
==606.2.6 Construction Inspection Guidelines for Guard Cable==


Refer to [[120.5 Roadside Features#120.5.1 Guard Cable|120.5.1 Guard Cable]] for regular inspection goals for interstate guard cable maintenance.
'''For [http://www.modot.org/business/standards_and_specs/SpecbookEPG.pdf#page=9 Sec 606.50.2]'''.  The embankment slope between the shoulder and the guard cable should be 1V:6H (6:1) or flatter, unless the system is approved for use on slopes as steep as 1V:4H (4:1). If only one run of high-tension guard cable is installed in the median, the slope on both sides of the guard cable should be 1V:6H (6:1) or flatter, unless the system is approved for use on slopes as steep as 1V:4H (4:1). No exceptions should be allowed unless approved by the Central Office. This is essential for the guard cable to perform as designed.  


==606.2.6 Maintenance Planning Guidelines for Guard Cable==
The embankment slope behind the guard cable is not critical (may be as steep as 1V:2H (2:1)) if another run of high-tension guard cable is installed on the other side of the median to prevent crossovers from that direction of traffic or if adequate clear zone is provided in the other direction of traffic. Such "double runs" are discouraged, however, since both the initial and lifetime costs are doubled.


These Maintenance planning guidelines apply to both [http://epg.modot.mo.gov/files/7/72/232_Major_Highways_Map.pdf major] and minor roads.
{| border="1" class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto" align="right" style="margin-left:10px"
{|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:15px; border:1px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="160px" align="right"  
|+
|-
! style="background:#BEBEBE"|Sieve Size !! style="background:#BEBEBE"|Percent Passing by Weight (mass)
|'''Code:''' R227
|-
|align="center"|3 in. (75mm)||align="center"| 100
|-
|align="center"|1 in. (25mm)|| align="center"|80
|-
|align="center"|No. 4 (4.75mm)|| align="center"|0-35
|}
|}
'''Aggregate Bedding (for [http://www.modot.org/business/standards_and_specs/SpecbookEPG.pdf#page=9 Sec. 606.50.2.4])'''. Predominantly one-sized stone as a bedding material for guard cable, as currently specified in Sec 606.50.4, will act as marbles when a vehicle impacts the bedding material and will likely result in an impacting vehicle to dive under the cable system and continue across the median into the opposing traffic, thereby defeating the purpose of the guard cable system. This is elevated to even a larger safety issue where contractors have provided sand or gravel as the bedding material, which have a greater tendency to roll like marbles when impacted and increases the probability for a vehicle to dive beneath the barrier system. In the interim of getting a specification revision, existing jobs should be change ordered to a bedding material consisting of a uniform, angular graded material of a gradation similar to that shown below. Verification of the gradation should be accomplished by visual inspection, and when in suspect, a sieve analysis should be conducted.


'''Definition'''
'''Delineators (for Sec. 606.50.2.5).''' All high-tension guard cable, regardless of the location of the guard cable, should be delineated, with delineator spacing, reflective sheeting and reflector colors in accordance with Sec 606.10.2.3.
The time and expenses incurred for installing and maintaining fences along the roadway, guardrails and end treatments, guardcable and impact attenuator devices for roadside obstacles as well as all costs to maintain concrete traffic barriers, sidewalks and bicycle paths and raised pavement markers.
 
'''Purpose'''
To restore guardcable.
 
'''Scheduling'''
As needed
 
'''Recommended Equipment'''
:* Truck
:* Post drive
:* Traffic Control Equipment, refer to [[616.23 Traffic Control for Field Operations|Traffic Control for Field Operations]].
 
'''Recommended Material'''
:* cable  
:* post
:* anchors
 
'''Recommended Procedure'''
 
1. Place traffic control devices as needed.  
 
2. Remove damaged cable and posts.
 
3. Install new posts and cable.
 
4. Remove traffic control devices.
 
'''Safety'''
Wear all appropriate Personal Protection Equip (PPE). Refer to [http://lnapp1/RI/RIManual.NSF/SHToC?OpenView Safety Policies, Rules & Regulations-Employee Handbook] .
 
'''Other Considerations'''
None.
 
'''Reference'''
[http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/standards_and_specs/Sec0606.pdf Sec 606]
 
 




[[Category:606 Guardrail and Guard Cable]]
[[Category:606 Guardrail and Guard Cable]]

Latest revision as of 07:44, 30 August 2024

Videos

606.2.1 Guard Cable Types

Guard cable consists of twisted wire ropes mounted on weak posts. There are two types of guard cable systems in use on Missouri roadways: low-tension and high-tension. All new installations will be high-tension.

606.2.1.1 Low-Tension. Existing low-tension guard cable may remain in place as long as the guard cable system is in serviceable condition. Low-tension guard cable shall not be used for new barrier installations. Existing low-tension guard cable systems may be repaired when damaged (see EPG 606.2.4 Maintenance and Repair) if practical. When low-tension guard cable is reaching the end of its serviceable condition, the District may consider letting a contract to replace the low-tension guard cable with high-tension guard cable (or other approved barrier).

Low-tension Guard Cable

606.2.1.2 High-Tension. High-tension guard cable consists of three or four pre-stressed cables supported by weak posts. All high-tension guard cable shall meet NCHRP 350 or MASH 2016 TL-3 requirements and be on MoDOT’s approved products list End Terminals, Crash Cushions and Barrier Systems. All high-tension guard cable shall be installed per manufacturer’s requirements.

A common installation of high-tension guard cable employs concrete footings into which metal tubes are cast, forming sockets. The socket allows a post to be replaced with relative ease during a repair operation. The damaged post can be removed from the socket and replaced with a new post. Socketed systems eliminate the requirement for specialized post driving equipment and subsurface utility location for each repair.

Median Guard Cable

606.2.2 Warrants

Analyses of cross-median incident history and traffic volume provide valuable information in determining the likelihood of future incidents on these routes. In order to prevent future incidents, it is important to focus safety efforts on locations that will benefit the most from safety countermeasures.

The risk of cross-median crashes can be influenced by median width and the traffic volume on both roadways (two-way AADT). Figure 606.2.2 shows various levels for implementation based on the anticipated benefits of reducing crashes compared to costs for installation, maintenance, and overall crash impact. The Highway Safety and Traffic Division may be contacted for additional details on how the anticipated benefits of guard cable installation were determined.

Figure 606.2.2, Median Guard Cable Levels as Related to Median Width and Two-Way AADT

Median guard cable should be installed in Level 1 locations.

Median guard cable may be installed in Level 2 or 3 locations based on engineering judgment. Guard cable may be installed on Level 4, but is not typical and should have additional justification based on the context of the location.

606.2.2.1 Data. Analysis of incidents on a candidate corridor should focus on cross-median incidents on that route.

It is important this data analysis is accurate and complete for all roadways. Due to at-grade intersection incidents on these routes, a simple query of cross-median incidents may include unwanted events and exclude necessary ones. Accuracy of this data is vital in decision-making.

The data should be reviewed regularly to validate priorities and identify any emerging cross-median safety concerns. A regular review of divided highway traffic volume and incidents will provide information to address cross-median incidents.

606.2.2.2 Traffic Volume. Recent research has connected traffic volume growth directly to cross-median incidents. As volume increases, the probability of a motorist crossing the median and hitting an oncoming vehicle also increases. Instead of relying solely on incident history, there is an opportunity to proactively address this incident type before the incidents occur by studying traffic volume patterns and installing a system of median guard cable on routes with sharply increasing volumes. See Figure 606.2.2 for the anticipated impact traffic volume has on crash risk and anticipated value for guard cable installation.

606.2.2.3 Median Width. Recent national experience has shown that cross-median incidents can occur on highways with median widths above MoDOT's initial 60 ft. threshold. Although this width has largely proven to be effective in deterring such incidents, no route will be excluded from analysis solely on the basis of median width. Divided highways with very wide medians are expected to have a low risk of cross-median incidents. See Figure 606.2.2 for the anticipated impact median width has on crash risk and anticipated value for guard cable installation.

606.2.3 Design and Installation Guidelines

606.2.3.1 Lateral Placement in the Median

Dynamics of Cross-Median Incidents. When a vehicle leaves the roadway and enters the median, certain predictable dynamics occur. Vehicles may enter the median at a variety of speeds and angles but for the purposes of roadside safety research and testing, a 62 mph departure at a 25° angle is generally used.

Upon departure, a vehicle will initially continue along its vertical trajectory. As the inslope falls away along the 25° vehicle path, the vehicle effectively becomes briefly airborne. When the vehicle's inertia can no longer overcome gravity, it lands and its suspension is deeply compressed. As the vehicle continues to travel through the median, the suspension rebounds and the bumper of the vehicle stays at a relatively constant height throughout the remainder of the errant journey.

Every guard cable incident is slightly different because of a host of site-specific factors. In general, however, the front of the vehicle must engage at least two of the three or four cables present in order to be contained by the system. Given the dynamics described above, lateral placement of the cable can be grouped into two main categories: medians wider than 30 ft. and those narrower than 30 ft.

Medians 30 ft. or wider. The guard cable should be installed no more than 4 ft. downslope of the edge of the shoulder. With wider shoulders, the downslope location could be less than 4 ft., but in any case, there shall be a minimum of 8 ft. between the barrier and the edge of traveled way. There are several advantages to this location but chief among them is the performance of the system in a incident. At the 4 ft. downslope location, the errant vehicle adjacent to the barrier, while airborne, is not at a great enough altitude to override the cable during a front side encounter. From the opposing direction, or backside, the suspension of the errant vehicle will have recovered enough to allow an impact to occur under relatively normal impact conditions.

If the 8 ft. separation cannot be obtained, the designer must work with the Central Office Design Division to assess the potential safety impacts of a decreased deflection distance. A different barrier system should be considered.

Medians narrower than 30 ft. In medians narrower than 30 ft., the guard cable should be installed within 1 ft. of the vertex of either a V or flat-bottomed ditch. As previously discussed, this location performs the most advantageously. When placed 4 ft. downslope in narrow medians, the suspension of the vehicle impacting from the back side (i.e. the opposite direction) is most tightly compressed near that location. A compressed suspension has potential to underride the system.

Alternating Sides. The designer may choose to alternate the sides of the median where the barrier is placed for the purpose of reducing any shy line issues or discomfort for motorists. The change should occur at natural breaks in the barrier such as emergency crossovers or median bridge columns.

606.2.3.2 Parallel Installations

In-service experience with parallel installations has shown less than desirable results. The close proximity of each installation to traffic has caused an inordinately high incidence of nuisance hits resulting in higher than acceptable long-term maintenance costs. Vegetative maintenance is also a concern.

Parallel installations of guard cable should not be used. Instead, designers should rely upon guard cable designed for the situation as a single run or consider a barrier system other than guard cable.

606.2.3.3 Post Spacing

  • Anchor Assembly
    Anchor Assembly
  • Vegetation Barrier
    Vegetation Barrier

While guard cable has been tested and approved with post spacing ranging from 6.5 to 32.5 ft., it is widely believed that the wider post spacing leads to greater deflections and an increased likelihood of vehicle penetration due to underride or traveling between the cables. For this reason, post spacing should not exceed the conventional limit of 20 ft or the manufacturer's recommendation. Additionally, increasing post spacing through horizontal curves increases the opportunity for the cable to assume a chord length if the posts are damaged. If enough posts are damaged, the cable could project into the travelway on the inside of the curve.

606.2.3.4 Slopes

Proprietary high-tension systems are approved for use on slopes with gradients between 1V:6H (6:1) to 1V:4H (4:1).

606.2.3.5 Vegetative Barrier

Vegetation control in the area between the cable and the passing lane should be addressed. Failure to provide some positive form of vegetation control will hinder the future maintenance of the system. The core team shall consult with the local maintenance personnel to arrive at a vegetative control measure that is mutually agreeable. Vegetation control may not be omitted from a project as a practical design or value engineering measure. Control of vegetation around guard cable systems can be largely addressed with the addition of a vegetative barrier. The use of a vegetative barrier reduces future hand mowing or herbicide operations. See JSP2404 Vegetative Barrier Pavement for design and construction requirements. See EPG 606.2.4 Maintenance and Repair for vegetation maintenance.

606.2.3.6 Termination at Crossovers and Emergency Crossovers

The design for guard cable termination as well as the grading for the crossover shall be in accordance with Standard Plan 606.42. Refer to EPG 240.4 Guard Cable Termination at Emergency Crossovers for additional information.

606.2.4 Maintenance and Repair

Guard cable is only as functional as its ongoing maintenance and repair. Proper maintenance and incident repair will ensure that the system is always in a state of functionality to provide motorists a greater level of safety on Missouri roadways.

Vegetation Maintenance. District maintenance shall provide vegetative control around guard cable systems. Vegetation maintenance measures should include mowing, herbicides, a geotextile-aggregate strip or an asphalt apron may have been constructed during initial installation.

Cable Tension. If pre-stressed cables are used for high-tension systems and compensators are properly compressed for low-tension systems, the tension in the cable should properly acclimate to any weather condition. Tension logs shall be stored in the contract specific eProjects folder. The tension log form is available at EPG 101 Standard Forms.

Cable Height. The importance of cable height to properly capture and redirect errant vehicles has been demonstrated. Although cable height is relatively static in all systems, erosion and tire rutting under the barrier can sometimes cause a localized increase in height, resulting in possible underride. When ditch erosion or rutting causes the cable heights to be outside the manufacturer’s recommended maximum, corrective measures should be performed by either the on-call contractor or by in-house Maintenance forces.

Maintenance personnel should be aware of minimum and maximum cable heights and encouraged to identify locations where erosion or the accumulation of silt have altered the relative cable height.

Median Condition. The median condition with respect to rutting, loss of vegetation and incident debris should be remedied by Maintenance forces following each incident.

Guard Cable Repair. Incident repairs shall be performed by the on-call contractor. See EPG 147.3.10 Guardrail and Guard Cable Repair for additional Job Order Contracting requirements for guard cable repairs.

Splices. Cable repair splices for low-tension systems will be no closer than 400 feet per cable within a 2000-foot run (anchor to anchor). When a repair to a low-tension cable would require splices closer than 400 feet, repair with a sufficient length of cable necessary to ensure splices are separated by no less than 400’.

Cable repair splices for high-tension systems will be no closer than 200 feet per cable within a 1000-foot run (turn buckle to turn buckle). When a repair to a high-tension cable would require splices closer than 200 feet, repair with a sufficient length of cable necessary to ensure splices are separated by no less than 200’.

606.2.5 Maintenance Planning Guidelines for Guard Cable

See Maintenance Planning Guideline for Guard Cable.

Index of all Maintenance Planning Guidelines.

606.2.6 Construction Inspection Guidelines for Guard Cable

For Sec 606.50.2. The embankment slope between the shoulder and the guard cable should be 1V:6H (6:1) or flatter, unless the system is approved for use on slopes as steep as 1V:4H (4:1). If only one run of high-tension guard cable is installed in the median, the slope on both sides of the guard cable should be 1V:6H (6:1) or flatter, unless the system is approved for use on slopes as steep as 1V:4H (4:1). No exceptions should be allowed unless approved by the Central Office. This is essential for the guard cable to perform as designed.

The embankment slope behind the guard cable is not critical (may be as steep as 1V:2H (2:1)) if another run of high-tension guard cable is installed on the other side of the median to prevent crossovers from that direction of traffic or if adequate clear zone is provided in the other direction of traffic. Such "double runs" are discouraged, however, since both the initial and lifetime costs are doubled.

Sieve Size Percent Passing by Weight (mass)
3 in. (75mm) 100
1 in. (25mm) 80
No. 4 (4.75mm) 0-35

Aggregate Bedding (for Sec. 606.50.2.4). Predominantly one-sized stone as a bedding material for guard cable, as currently specified in Sec 606.50.4, will act as marbles when a vehicle impacts the bedding material and will likely result in an impacting vehicle to dive under the cable system and continue across the median into the opposing traffic, thereby defeating the purpose of the guard cable system. This is elevated to even a larger safety issue where contractors have provided sand or gravel as the bedding material, which have a greater tendency to roll like marbles when impacted and increases the probability for a vehicle to dive beneath the barrier system. In the interim of getting a specification revision, existing jobs should be change ordered to a bedding material consisting of a uniform, angular graded material of a gradation similar to that shown below. Verification of the gradation should be accomplished by visual inspection, and when in suspect, a sieve analysis should be conducted.

Delineators (for Sec. 606.50.2.5). All high-tension guard cable, regardless of the location of the guard cable, should be delineated, with delineator spacing, reflective sheeting and reflector colors in accordance with Sec 606.10.2.3.

Retrieved from "https://epgtest3.modot.org/index.php?title=606.2_Guard_Cable&oldid=54209"