Category talk:101 Standard Forms - Revision history

Smithk at 19:25, 18 January 2013

2013-01-18T19:25:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 18 January 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.		[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.

	The Quick Reference Guides for Contract Adjustments list AC Adjustments as a Contract Adjustment Type. This changed July 1, 2012 to be a Line Item Adjustment. The 2 ~~QRG's~~ for Contract Adjustments that come up in the search need to be updated to remove this as a type of Contract Adjustment.		The Quick Reference Guides for Contract Adjustments list AC Adjustments as a Contract Adjustment Type. This changed July 1, 2012 to be a Line Item Adjustment. The 2 QRGs for Contract Adjustments that come up in the search need to be updated to remove this as a type of Contract Adjustment.

			[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: It appears that the QRGs are all correct as displayed in the various EPG articles. Nonetheless, when a search is made for the QRG, old QRGs show up. This is because the EPG wiki remembers the old QRG forms (that no longer are present in the articles) and presents them with the current ones. This can be confusing. I cannot erase the wiki's "memory" or keep the search engine from seeing that history (since this same ability is crucial in many other search applications). I don't have a really good solution, unfortunately. This has occurred in other similar situations, with the results that the wiki remembered all sorts of things that no longer apply. Since the search engine can only perform as well as Google can make it, I guess all I can say is for someone to be sufficiently aware when googling the EPG and only accept those items that are currently presented in the EPG when there seems to be some sort of conflict. Not perfect, but I hope that helps.

Brookw1 at 17:09, 18 January 2013

2013-01-18T17:09:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 18 January 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.		[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.

			The Quick Reference Guides for Contract Adjustments list AC Adjustments as a Contract Adjustment Type. This changed July 1, 2012 to be a Line Item Adjustment. The 2 QRG's for Contract Adjustments that come up in the search need to be updated to remove this as a type of Contract Adjustment.

Smithk at 20:27, 16 March 2011

2011-03-16T20:27:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 16 March 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:

	[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.		[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.

	~~The link to the time extension change order reasons is broken.~~

Beranr1 at 20:18, 16 March 2011

2011-03-16T20:18:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 16 March 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:

	[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.		[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.

			The link to the time extension change order reasons is broken.

Smithk at 20:19, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T20:19:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 9 March 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	At least one of the posters on this page (MCHR-9) is outdated. Would it be better to just have a link to the posters on MoDOT's "Contractor Forms" page? [http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/contractor_resources/forms.htm]		At least one of the posters on this page (MCHR-9) is outdated. Would it be better to just have a link to the posters on MoDOT's "Contractor Forms" page? [http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/contractor_resources/forms.htm]
	--[[User:Martik2\|Martik2]] 12:16, 9 March 2010 (CST)		--[[User:Martik2\|Martik2]] 12:16, 9 March 2010 (CST)

			[[User:smithk\|Keith L. Smith]]: Thanks for the heads up. We got with External Civil Rights and they have revised what they want in the EPG.

EPG-Admin at 18:16, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T18:16:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 9 March 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:tschid\|Dan Tschirgi]]:The Project Scoping Memorandum has been corrected.		[[User:tschid\|Dan Tschirgi]]:The Project Scoping Memorandum has been corrected.

			At least one of the posters on this page (MCHR-9) is outdated. Would it be better to just have a link to the posters on MoDOT's "Contractor Forms" page? [http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/contractor_resources/forms.htm]
			--[[User:Martik2\|Martik2]] 12:16, 9 March 2010 (CST)

EPG-Admin at 19:30, 19 March 2009

2009-03-19T19:30:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 19 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Please Correct the "construction Contingency" Cell within the Project Scoping Memorandum. Construction Contingency is suppose to be 2% but the cell is multiplying it by 3%.		Please Correct the "construction Contingency" Cell within the Project Scoping Memorandum. Construction Contingency is suppose to be 2% but the cell is multiplying it by 3%.

			[[User:tschid\|Dan Tschirgi]]:The Project Scoping Memorandum has been corrected.

EPG-Admin: New page: Please Correct the "construction Contingency" Cell within the Project Scoping Memorandum. Construction Contingency is suppose to be 2% but the cell is multiplying it by 3%.

2009-03-13T18:11:51Z

New page: Please Correct the "construction Contingency" Cell within the Project Scoping Memorandum. Construction Contingency is suppose to be 2% but the cell is multiplying it by 3%.

New page

Please Correct the "construction Contingency" Cell within the Project Scoping Memorandum. Construction Contingency is suppose to be 2% but the cell is multiplying it by 3%.